Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
199-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

199-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028943 50.866719)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028886 50.866713,-1.028888 50.866725,-1.028896 50.866735,-1.028909 50.866743,-1.028924 50.866748,-1.028942 50.866750,-1.028959 50.866748,-1.028975 50.866743,-1.028988 50.866735,-1.028996 50.866725,-1.028999 50.866714,-1.028997 50.866703,-1.028989 50.866693,-1.028977 50.866685,-1.028961 50.866680,-1.028943 50.866678,-1.028926 50.866680,-1.028910 50.866685,-1.028897 50.866692,-1.028889 50.866702,-1.028886 50.866713)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL